getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Applications of the individual zone of optimal functioning model for the multimodal treatment of precompetitive anxiety

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Annesi, J. J.
JOURNAL:
  The Sport Psychologist, 12(3), 300 - 316.
YEAR: 1998
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): pre-competition; anxiety; treatment; theoretical-model; evaluation; testing; athlete
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=S-13619&title=S-13619
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-341-368 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:04 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Effects of a precompetitive anxiety regulation system, based upon tenets of the individual zones of optimal functioning (IZOF) model, multidimensional anxiety theory, and the specific-effects hypothesis, were tested. In Phase I, case studies (3 elite adolescent tennis players) were used to analyze the IZOF model within a multidimensional state anxiety framework. In Phase II, the effectiveness of a precompetitive anxiety regulation system, based upon IZOF and the specific-effects hypothesis, was tested for enhancing match performance. Essential elements of IZOF theory were supported. In Phase II, in-zone/out-of-zone A-state assessment was used to guide athletes' treatment selections. After training athletes in prematch psychological skills designed to regulate specific cognitive state anxiety, somatic state anxiety, and state self-confidence dimensions, posttreatment performances yielded higher values (ps less than .05) than pretreatment. The need to replicate findings through different sample types, sports, and expertise levels was emphasized. Concerns with intrusion into athletes' precompetitive routines were discussed.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   3 
 References   1 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   6/984 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.