getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Training mental quickness in beginning/intermediate tennis players

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Singer, R. N. (University of Florida)
  Author Cauraugh, J. H. (University of Florida)
  Author Chen, D.
  Author Steinberg, G. M.
  Author Frelich, S. G.
  Author Wang, L.
JOURNAL:
  The Sport Psychologist, 8(3), 305 - 318.
YEAR: 1994
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): tennis; novice-athlete; anticipation; accuracy; teaching; reaction-time; comparative-study; mental-process
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=356656&title=356656
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-341-271 (Last edited on 2002/03/07 17:32:00 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The trainability of anticipatory skills for tennis was assessed. Subjects (N=34) from a beginning/intermediate tennis class were randomly assigned to either a mental quickness or a physical quickness (control) training group. They were tested in three laboratory tennis simulation tasks and three on-court tasks (serves, ground strokes, and volleys) 1 week before and after the 3-week quickness training program. Quickness Training times Gender times Test Session (2 times 2 times 2) ANOVAs with repeated measures on the third factor were conducted. For the laboratory tasks, the mental quickness group made faster decisions in reaction to serves, exhibited faster anticipation times, and showed improved accuracy in predicting serve type and location. No improvements in accuracy were found for the physical quickness group. For filmed match-play situations, the mental quickness group improved reaction times with training and committed fewer response errors. Implications for the design of instructional methods used in dynamic and fast-paced sports are discussed.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   6/640 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.