getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Motivation and attrition of female coaches: an application of social exchange theory

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Weiss, M. R. (University of Virginia)
  Author Stevens, C.
JOURNAL:
  The Sport Psychologist, 7(3), 244 - 261.
YEAR: 1993
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): motivation; attrition; woman; coach; coaching; satisfaction
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=327203&title=327203
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-341-246 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:04 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Studies examining the declining percentage of female coaches at the high school and collegiate levels have either been descriptive or sociological in nature. The present study was designed to explore this phenomenon from a psychological vantage, specifically using a social exchange theoretical perspective. Current (n=99) and former (n=54) coaches completed self report measures that assessed benefits, costs, and satisfaction levels with overall coaching experiences and alternative activities. A discriminant function analysis revealed that current and former coaches could be distinguished on the basis of certain benefits, costs, and satisfaction levels. Current coaches assigned greater importance to benefits, costs, and satisfaction levels. Current coaches assigned greater importance to benefits relating to program success and continuation of athletic experiences, costs relating to time demands and low perceived competence, and overall satisfaction with coaching. Moreover, 74.4 percent and 75.6 percent of current and former coaches, respectively, could be classified correctly to group membership based on scores on these variables. These results provide only partial support for social exchange theory predictions.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   2 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/514 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.