getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

The effect of three different methods of mental training on dart throwing performance

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Straub, W. F. (b. 1926, d. ----)
JOURNAL:
  The Sport Psychologist, 3(2), 133 - 141.
YEAR: 1989
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): darts; mental-training; program; comparative-study
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=264812&title=264812
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-341-118 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:01 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
This study was designed to (a) determine whether three frequently used mental skills training programs enhance dart throwing performance beyond that obtained by physical practice and a no-practice control, (b) compare the relative effectiveness of the three methods of mental training programs, and (c) determine if these programs differentially affect subjects who were initially of high or low skill. The subjects (N=75) were college-age men and women who were matched between conditions on ability level. In addition to the three MT groups, there was one physical practice (PP) and one control group (C). The three methods of MT included Bennett and Pravitz' (1982, 1987), Gauron's (1984), and Unestahl's (1983b) packaged programs. Significant group differences were found in posttest dart throwing performance; in particular, subjects receiving the Bennett and Pravitz and Unestahl MT differed from the control group. It was concluded that Bennett and Pravitz and Unestahl packaged programs were effective since they significantly differed from the control and equaled the performance of the PP group, despite receiving substantially less physical practice.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   1 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   4/397 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.