getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

The effects of task structure and teammate competence on social loafing

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Hardy, C. J. (Georgia Southern University)
  Author Kelly-Crace, R.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology (JSEP), 13(4), 372 - 381.
YEAR: 1991
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): psychology; achievement; group-dynamics; collective-behaviour; motivation; social-loafing
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=289609&title=289609
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-340-304 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:43:55 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Previous research has demonstrated that the difference between a group's potential and its actual productivity is, in part, a function of individuals exerting less effort when working as a team. This phenomenon has been labeled social loafing. Harkins and Petty (1982) have suggested that the way in which teammates think their outputs are combined to make up the team score and teammate competence may influence the social loafing effect. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of additive, disjunctive, and conjunctive task structures on individual effort expended by rowers and nonrowers. In Experiment 1, 30 male nonrowers were assigned to dyads and performed two (alone, team) 45-sec trials on Concept II rowing ergometers. Ten subjects performed under additive, 10 under disjunctive, and 10 under conjunctive task conditions. Results demonstrated no significant effects. In Experiment 2, 30 subjects were assigned to 15 dyads with the restriction that 1 member of each dyad be a collegiate rower and 1 be a nonrower. The results revealed (a) that rowers expended more effort than nonrowers and (b) a social loafing effect for the least proficient teammate.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   2 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   7/963 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2013 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.