getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Intermediate measures and recognition testing of sponsorship advertising at an LPGA tournament

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Cuneen, J. (Bowling Green State University)
  Author Hannan, M. J.
JOURNAL:
  Sport Marketing Quarterly [SMQ], 2(1), 47 - 56.
YEAR: 1993
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): golf; spectator; advertising; sponsorship; Ladies-Professional-Golf-Association; sign
DISCIPLINE: Recreation, Sports & Leisure Studies
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=316241&title=316241
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-337-683 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:43:51 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Traditional methods (intermediate measures/recognition testing) were used to assess sponsorship recognition by spectators attending an LPGA tournament. An instrument was developed based on one designed by Stotlar and Johnson (1989) to study impact and effectiveness of stadium signage. Questionnaires were distributed to spectators (N=451) during three afternoons of the chamnpionship round. Respondents indicated the ads they saw on the grounds, the locations where they noticed ads, their spectating styles, which sponsors' products/services they use currently, and which they may use as a result of seeing signage at the tournament. Demographic data (age, income, and gender) were also collected. Results indicated that each of 27 sponsors was recognized by respondents. Frequency distributions showed that ads of products/services available on the grounds and saturation signage were the most frequently recognized. Logistic regression models found main effects differences in recognition related to age, income, spectating style, and current product/service usage.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   1 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   5/395 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.