getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

A conceptualization of team building in high performance sport as a season-long process

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Schinke, R. J.
  Author Draper, S. P.
  Author Salmela, J. H. (University of Ottawa / Université d'Ottawa)
JOURNAL:
  Avante, 3(2), 57 - 72.
YEAR: 1997
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): hockey; basketball; group-cohesion; coaching; group-dynamics
DISCIPLINE: Recreation, Sports & Leisure Studies
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=454981&title=454981
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-336-531 (Last edited on 2002/05/11 14:08:28 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 expert Canadian ice hockey and basketball coaches regarding the nature of team building strategies used throughout each season. Team building was a complex higher order knowledge category than encompassed more than the simple mechanics of assembling a team. The process was described by coaches as a continuous cycle where team building components were introduced temporally during the pre, early, mid, late, and post season. During the pre-season, athletes were selected by consideration of physical attributes and attitudes compatible with their coaches. Then, in the early season, coaches began communicating their team vision, having athletes buy into team goals, and then refining team members accordingly. Later, during the mid-season, coaches focused on formalizing their teams' performances for late season tournaments. Finally, based on varying performance results, the coaches refined their team building strategies. For these expert coaches, successful performance was a by-product achieved only after meeting the objectives set out in earlier phases.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   7/738 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2013 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.