getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

An empirically based selection and evaluation system for collegiate football

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Libkuman, T. M. (Central Michigan University)
  Author Love, K. G. (Central Michigan University)
  Author Donn, P. D. (Wayne State University)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Management [JSM], 12(3), 220 - 241.
YEAR: 1998
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): university; football; selection; evaluation
DISCIPLINE: Recreation, Sports & Leisure Studies
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=481015&title=481015
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-334-974 (Last edited on 2002/03/03 18:03:44 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Using a content validity approach, including job analysis, a model was developed for the selection and appraisal of college football players. Evaluation instruments were developed for offensive lineman, quarterback, running back, receiver, defensive lineman, linebacker, and defensive secondary. Criterion related validity studies were then conducted by sending the evaluation instruments to a nation-wide sample of college football coaches who evaluated players at each position. Criterion data (e.g., passing and rushing performance statistics) were collected on the evaluated players. Multiple linear regression analyses conducted by position revealed numerous significant relationships between the predictor variables and the criterion measures. The usefulness of the evaluation instruments was enhanced by developing a simple and cost effective model that generated performance predictions for each position. Strengths and weaknesses of the present system were discussed as well as the role that sport management may play in such an endeavor.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References   48 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   7/614 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.