Parks, Russell and Wood (1993) Marital and other primary dyadic relationships of intercollegiate athletics administrators

getCITED

Home Search Add Content Reports Help

Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations

Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Marital and other primary dyadic relationships of intercollegiate athletics administrators

Post a Comment

CONTRIBUTORS:

	Author:	Parks, J. B. (b. 1942, d. ----)
	Author:	Russell, R. L. (b. ----, d. ----)
	Author:	Wood, P. H. (b. ----, d. ----)

JOURNAL:

Journal of Sport Management [JSM], 7(2), 151 - 158.

YEAR:

1993

PUB TYPE:

Journal Article

SUBJECT(S):

university; sport; manager; athletic-director; marriage; family

DISCIPLINE:

Recreation, Sports & Leisure Studies

HTTP:

https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=317786&title=317786

LANGUAGE:

English

PUB ID:

103-334-883 (Last edited on 2002/03/03 18:03:44 US/Mountain)

SPONSOR(S):

ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to investigate marital and other primary dyadic relationships of intercollegiate athletics administrators at the 106 NCAA Division IA institutions (N=1072). The Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976, 1989) was used to assess perceptions of hte quality of dyadic relationships among administrators who were either married or in unmarried, cohabiting partnerships ( n=402). Application of independent samples t tests, with alpha adjusted from .05 to .003 by Bonferroni's contrasting procedure, revealed that (a) there was a significant difference between Dyadic Cohesion scores of athletics administrators and the married norm group (p less than .001), and (b) female athletics administrators and the married norm group (p less than .001), and (b) female athletics administrators produced significantly higher scores in Dyadic Cohesion than did male athletics administrators (p less than .003). Future research should include an investigation of dyadic adjustment of the mates/partners of intercollegiate athletics administrators to facilitate comparisons of the two perceptions of the relationship.

STATISTICS

Click on # to view
Citations		0
References		5
Comments		0
Quality		0/0.00
Interest		0/0.00
View(er)s		4/909

Quality
	N/A
High
	7
	6
	5
	4
	3
	2
	1
Low

Interest
	N/A
High
	7
	6
	5
	4
	3
	2
	1
Low

Prev | Next