getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Applicability of job diagnostic survey to administrative positions in university physical education and sport

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Cleave, S. (University of New Brunswick)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Management [JSM], 7(2), 141 - 150.
YEAR: 1993
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): Illinois; Canada; university; sport; physical-education; manager; athletic-director; job-analysis; job-satisfaction
DISCIPLINE: Recreation, Sports & Leisure Studies
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=317785&title=317785
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-334-871 (Last edited on 2002/03/03 18:03:44 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Although administrators of physical education and sport programs have been the focus of considerable research, one area that has been neglected is the design of administrative positions and its influence on the levels of satisfaction and motivation experienced by administrators. This study was undertaken to address this deficiency. The relationship between job design and worker attitudes and behaviors has been examined in business and industry for many years and a number of models have been developed. The Job Characteristics Model of job design developed by Hackman and Oldham (1976, 1980) provided the theoretical framework for the study. The sample for the study consisted of administrators in physical education, intercollegiate athletics, and recreation/intramural programs in selected Canadian and American universities. The analyses showed significant differences between this sample and the general working population with respect to perceptions of job design and levels of satisfaction and motivation. Gender and nationality had minimal effect on the administrators' perceptions.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   3 
 References   8 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   9/2195 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.