getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Comparison of job responsibilities of intercollegiate athletic directors and professional sport general managers

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Hatfield, B. D. (University of Maryland College Park)
  Author Wrenn, J. P. (University of Maryland College Park)
  Author Bretting, M. M. (Eastern Michigan University)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Management [JSM], 1(2), 129 - 145.
YEAR: 1987
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): comparative-study; university; sport; program; administration; athletic-director; manager; aptitude
DISCIPLINE: Recreation, Sports & Leisure Studies
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=230304&title=230304
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-334-803 (Last edited on 2002/03/03 18:03:44 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
A problem cited by critics of preparation programs in sport management has been the lack of specialty tracks. Therefore, responses regarding the perceived importance of job responsibilities, demographic information, and educational recommendations were solicited from athletic directors (ADs) (n is 58) of NCAA Division I-A football programs and from general managers (GMs) (n is 62) within professional sport to characterize the two areas. Multivariate contrasts upon groups of items in all areas of job responsibility yielded significant differences. The GMs rated the areas of labor relations and personnel evaluations as more important, while the ADs assigned higher ratings to all other categories (i.e., marketing, financial management, administration, public relations). A discriminant function analysis upon the individual job items corroborated these differences. These findings were discussed in terms of recommendations for the education of sport administrators.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   17 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   5/1715 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.